uri »
Protoze sem to uprimne moc nesledoval, tak sem se vydal zpatky v case k poslednimu reportu WHO na tema puvodu, abych byl plne v obraze... Precetl sem to cely a pak si k tomu nasel komentare predsedy WHO Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Ty komentare jsou dost zajimavy, protoze priznava velmi limitovanej pristup k datum a odkazanost na to co jim da Cinska strana.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/30/who-criticises-chinas-data-sharing-as-it-releases-covid-origins-report
"In my discussions with the team, they expressed the difficulties they encountered in accessing raw data
I expect future collaborative studies to include more timely and comprehensive data sharing
Scientists would benefit from full access to data including biological samples from at least September 2019
I concur with the team’s conclusion that farmers, suppliers and their contacts will need to be interviewed
Team also visited several laboratories in Wuhan and considered the possibility that the virus entered the human population as a result of a laboratory incident.
However, I do not believe that this assessment was extensive enough.
Further data and studies will be needed to reach more robust conclusions.
Let me say clearly that as far as WHO is concerned all hypotheses remain on the table.
Although the team has concluded that a laboratory leak is the least likely hypothesis, this requires further investigation, potentially with additional missions involving specialist experts, which I am ready to deploy
This report is a very important beginning, but it is not the end."
plnej report: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-convened-global-study-of-origins-of-sars-cov-2-china-part
Necekam, ze by se to chtelo cist nekomu dalsimu, protoze je to 120 stranek, ale doporucil bych aspon na zacatku Summary a Main Findings, pak na konci poslednich 8 stranek primo na tema Possible pathways of emergence.
Tam hodnoti nasledujici 4 hypotezy, ktery jsou serazeny podle pravdepodobnosti
direct zoonotic transmission (also termed: spillover)
- Based on the arguments listed, the zoonotic introduction scenario was listed as possible to likely
introduction through an intermediate host followed by zoonotic transmission
- Based on the above arguments, the scenario including introduction through an intermediary host was considered to be likely to very likely.
introduction through the cold/food chain
- The consensus was that given the level of evidence, the potential for SARS-CoV-2 introduction via cold/food chain products is considered possible.
introduction through a laboratory incident
- In view of the above, a laboratory origin of the pandemic was considered to be extremely unlikely.
Prvni dve jsou pomerne jasny, znate z TV co znamenaj a porad jsou to hlavni kandidati, ackoliv se nedari nikde najit primej predek SARS-CoV-2.
Na coz navazuje treti hypoteza, ta prakticky bere prvni dve o primym zoonotickym prenosu, kde se prenos odehrava pomoci konzumace zivocisnejch produktu z nakazenych zvirat. Plus kontaminaci potravin a jejich obalu obecne. Specificky zvireci trus na obalech mrazenych produktu. Ta argumentace pokracuje a zvlastne roztaha napric nekolika pointama. Neumim to elegantne prelozit a shrnout. Fakt doporucuju si to precist, neni to dlouhy a muzete posoudit sami jestli tam citite zaujatost nebo ne.
No a nakonec teda unik z laboratore, kterej zprava kompletne zavrhla jako extreme nepravdepodnej. Kuriozne narozdil od treti hypotezy s rozvlacnou argumentaci je to kratky a primy. Argument pro pripousti, ze laborator se stehovala 2. Prosince 2019 a nehody se stavaj. Argument proti je, krome nejaky omacky okolo, postavanej na neexistenci vzorku pribuznyho SARS-CoV-2 v katalogu laboratore pred Prosincem 2019.
Muj celkovej dojem z toho reportu, je dost docela do oci bijici snaha predvedcit ctenare o velmi realny moznosti puvodu rony mimo Cinu. Nekolikrat v prubehu pouziva absenci primyho predka SARS-CoV-2 jako argument pro zamereni dalsiho vysetrovani v okolnich zemich, hlavne jihovychodni Asii.
Jako tresnicka na dortu je fakt, ze je to "Joint WHO-China Study".
TL;DR: Ten report nema prakticky zadnou hodnotu, veskery interpretace dat jsou dodany Cinskou stranou, WHO nedostalo pristup k nicemu hodnotnymu. Cely je to prolezly snahou vnutit ctenari myslenku o moznosti, ze puvod rony je mimo Cinu. A hypoteza o uniku z laboratore je kategoricky vyvracena "cestnym" prohlasenim Cinsky strany, ze zadnej vzorek pribuznej SARS-CoV-2 pred prosincem 2019 neexistoval v katalogu laboratore. Coz se neda nijak dokazat.
sry za spam, nemam nic lepsiho na praci